Why Seasteading Matters

A lot of bad things happen in the world, which means there are a lot of options for those who wish to make the world a better place.  And there are some consistent patterns to the badness which make some areas more fruitful than others for the advancement of humanity.  Arnold Kling writes:

My co-blogger cites the number of people murdered by Stalin as an example of government-caused harm that is very difficult for the private sector to top.

Here are some more comparisons to consider:

1. The total death and illness caused by all of the chemical pollution ever created vs. the death and illness caused by the ban on DDT.

2. The GDP lost due to consumption of illegal drugs vs. the GDP lost due to the drug war.

3. The deprivation and suffering caused by predatory lending and other subprime mortgage shenanigans vs. that caused by biofuel mandates.

Now, I am not an expert on any of these topics, but each of them is something I have read a bit about.  And while I'm not going to claim that any of these has been definitively proven, I agree with Arnold that there is a strong case to be made that:

  1. Far more people were killed in the 20th century by their own governments than by individuals.
  2. More death and illness were caused by the ban on DDT than by pollution from corporations during the same time period.
  3. More GDP is lost due to the drug war (particularly the labor lost from the huge prison population it creates) than by drug addiction and other negative effects of drugs.
  4. Biofuel policies are causing enormous, worldwide harm (although so did subprime mortgage shenanigans - I'm not willing to make a direct comparison here).

In other words, there is a very practical, non-ideological argument that if you look at the empirical evidence, the largest concentration of badness occurs due to government action.  Which is why seasteading is so enormously important.  For whatever reason (and we have our ideas), the political arena turns out to be the area that is most holding us back from having a healthier, richer, happier world.

So while we here at TSI support anyone who is trying to make the world a better place, whether fighting disease, poverty, or injustice, the simple truth is that not all of these noble quests are of equal value.  We may be biased (and surely we are), but we think that by fighting to reform government, we are working on the key problem currently facing humanity.  The course will be long and stormy, but we think we're pointed at the greatest prize.

So please consider joining our informal community,  and watch this space for more ways to help.

 

 

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

fuzzy.

Is it perhaps sending mixed messages to have a libertarian blog and call yourself 'captain' Patri.

Your examples seem not too clear. who banned DDT? How would even begin to count pollution? If you are feeding a person an accumulative poison, and are at 50% of a lethal dose, are you guilty of murder? If somebody spends untold billions cleaning up CO2 (unnecessarily as you think) and thus don't save children with asthma, how do you count that? Which is more governmentally involved the biofuels mandate or subprime lending? I couldn't begin to guess.
Someone might ask which did more harm the school lunch program or winchester firearms company, in an exactly similar manner.

And this "Your comment has

And this "Your comment has been queued for moderation by site administrators and will be published after approval." seems particularly libertarian...

I would frame the question differently...

The problem with selecting individual governmental programs and saying "these programs are bad, thus government is bad", is that people immediately focus in on the selected programs and argue with you about them.

A better question to ask is: "Is the government of country X getting better or worse?" where X is the country that you care about. Another question to ask is "Are there feedback mechanisms in place to get the government to improve or are they totally broken?"

If you compare Russia under Stalin vs. Russia today, you might conclude that things actually improved. However, you might also look at some of the behaviors of Vladimir Putin and conclude that maybe things are starting to head south. So time scale matters and feedback systems matter.

In the best of circumstances, we have good government with good feedback mechanisms. Is better to live in a country with mediocre government, but good improvement feedback mechanisms or a good government where the feedback mechanisms are kind of broken?

-Wayne

Anonymous - moderating

Anonymous - moderating comments from unregistered users is done as a spam-fighting technique.

What ban on DDT? The one in

What ban on DDT?
The one in America, where people don't get malaria?

Maybe Kling is correct when he retreats to the claim that there's a secret ban enforced by erratic retaliation, but referring to "the ban" as if it were clear what you're talking about is deceitful.

Normal 0 Change is the

Normal
0

Change is the only constant thing in this world. And there is no one exempted from changing. A person changes from physical to emotional aspects.

With our economy falling behind, the war on terror, pork barreling legislation, corruption, and criminal activity on the rise, payday loans should be the last thing on politicians’ minds. Yet, for some reason, high profile politicians like Obama are focusing on this issue. Some states have banned them, such as Georgia and North Carolina, and more are in the process. Instead of fixing the important issues, they are trying to take out the payday loan industry for personal and political gain. Payday loans are simply for short term financial assistance for the all-American family to cover some cost that wasn’t budgeted or an emergency that they couldn’t pay for at that moment. They provide help to citizens during these financially troubling times with loans that the government otherwise couldn’t provide themselves. Stop the potential loss of thousands of jobs and the loss of a viable financial option by voicing your opinion to the legislature, before a nationwide ban becomes in effect.

 There are lots of changes that would come. But whatever it is it must be the change for the better!

Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store

Professional Blogging Team

Feed Back:  1-866-641-3406

Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html

Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/

 

Changing Weather

Normal
0

Malaria is a vector-borne infectious disease caused by protozoan parasites like the mosquito. It is widespread in tropical and subtropical regions, including parts of the Americas, Asia, and Africa. Each year, there are approximately 515 million cases of malaria, killing between one and three million people, the majority of who are young children. Since the weather is changing we are prone to some disease particularly the children. The leaves are changing and the weather is getting much cooler, which is a good indication that flu season is upon us once again. Most people know that washing your hands is the easiest (and most inexpensive) way to prevent the spread of disease and illness, including the flu virus. If you didn’t know that, WASH YOUR HANDS! What many people don’t realize is how serious the flu is; about 226,000 people are hospitalized every year, and nearly 36,000 people die each year on behalf of the flu virus. Unfortunately, preventing and treating the flu can be costly. Health experts suggest getting an annual flu shot. You can typically get flu shots for $20-$30, but if you have a family of five, those $30 shots add up quickly. If you end up getting the flu, treatment can be expensive too, especially if it requires a hospital visit. Needless to say, flu season can take a toll on your body and your budget. This is a friendly reminder that a payday cash loan can help cover medical bills. Oh, and don’t forget to wash your hands!

To read more click this link