Comments page

(You may have to reload this page to see new comments or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source section may have been edited since some of these comments were made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Wed Nov 12 14:00:03 PST 2003 ]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 16:51:32 EDT 2004 ]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 17:00:09 EDT 2004 ]
[ Modified Fri Oct 29 02:11:06 EDT 2004 ]
[ Modified Fri Oct 29 02:15:03 EDT 2004 ]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:15:48 EST 2004 ]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:30:04 EST 2004 ]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:14 EST 2004 ]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:37 EST 2004 ]

There is no single "right" approach to seasteading. Thus we will present you with many ideas, exploring those we think are the most viable in the most detail. However, it does seem like there are some "wrong" approaches, as we can see from the many failures of projects with the same goal. What we've learned from the movement's (admittedly dismal) history has to a large degree shaped our philosophy. Because of this, explaining our approach goes hand-in-hand with identifying common points of failure and indicating how we think they can be overcome.

Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/why.html#There_is_no_single_right_approach_to_seasteading_T

Add a comment

Comments:


Add a comment:

We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional. Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers. Comments may be deleted at the sysadmins whim.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This will be improved later.
Name:
Email:

Comments:


Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/why.html for this day, week, month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package dy> dy> dy> dy>