Comments page
(You may have to reload this page to see new comments
or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source
section may have been edited since some of these comments were
made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Wed Nov 12 14:00:03 PST 2003
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 16:51:32 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 17:00:09 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Fri Oct 29 02:11:06 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Fri Oct 29 02:15:03 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:15:48 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:30:04 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:14 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:37 EST 2004
]
There is no single "right" approach to seasteading. Thus we
will present you with many ideas, exploring those we think are
the most viable in the most detail. However, it does seem like
there are some "wrong" approaches, as we can see from the many
failures of projects with the same goal. What we've learned from
the movement's (admittedly dismal) history has to a large degree
shaped our philosophy. Because of this, explaining our approach
goes hand-in-hand with identifying common points of failure and
indicating how we think they can be overcome.
Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/why.html#There_is_no_single_right_approach_to_seasteading_T
Add a comment
Comments:
Add a comment:
We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional.
Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers.
Comments may be deleted at the sysadmins whim.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This
will be improved later.
Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/why.html for this
day,
week,
month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package