Comments page
(You may have to reload this page to see new comments
or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source
section may have been edited since some of these comments were
made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Wed Mar 3 07:35:12 PST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 16:51:32 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 17:00:09 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:15:48 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:30:05 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:14 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:38 EST 2004
]
Seasteaders will not make the mistake of counting on an
impractical technology to make their vision happen. Our concept
is a big enough jump already, and the fewer jumps we make along
with it the better. So while necessity has prompted some novelty
in our designs, they are firmly rooted in standard engineering
techniques. You'll see us examining a number of cutting-edge
technologies, yet planning to use very few of them on early
seasteads. Our power will come from solar panels, wind turbines,
and fossil fuel backup generators, not OTEC plants. Reinforced
concrete is an extremely cheap construction material, and we'll
buy it from standard terrestrial sources. In short, our
philosophy is to plan our initial designs around mature
technologies and save the innovation for later iterations.
Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/why.html#Seasteaders_will_not_make_the_mistake_of_counting_
Add a comment
Comments:
Add a comment:
We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional.
Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers.
Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This
will be improved later.
Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/why.html for this
day,
week,
month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package