Comments page

(You may have to reload this page to see new comments or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source section may have been edited since some of these comments were made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Wed Mar 3 07:35:12 PST 2004 ]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 16:51:32 EDT 2004 ]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 17:00:09 EDT 2004 ]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:15:48 EST 2004 ]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:30:05 EST 2004 ]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:14 EST 2004 ]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:38 EST 2004 ]

Seasteaders will not make the mistake of counting on an impractical technology to make their vision happen. Our concept is a big enough jump already, and the fewer jumps we make along with it the better. So while necessity has prompted some novelty in our designs, they are firmly rooted in standard engineering techniques. You'll see us examining a number of cutting-edge technologies, yet planning to use very few of them on early seasteads. Our power will come from solar panels, wind turbines, and fossil fuel backup generators, not OTEC plants. Reinforced concrete is an extremely cheap construction material, and we'll buy it from standard terrestrial sources. In short, our philosophy is to plan our initial designs around mature technologies and save the innovation for later iterations.

Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/why.html#Seasteaders_will_not_make_the_mistake_of_counting_

Add a comment

Comments:


Add a comment:

We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional. Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers. Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This will be improved later.
Name:
Email:

Comments:


Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/why.html for this day, week, month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package y> y> y>