Comments page
(You may have to reload this page to see new comments
or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source
section may have been edited since some of these comments were
made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 16:51:32 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 17:00:09 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:15:48 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:30:04 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:14 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:38 EST 2004
]
Freedom of movement and self-sufficiency are both intimately
connected with political freedom. Fixed locations such as
seamounts, islands, and atolls are much more vulnerable to the
whims of nearby governments, but a mobile seastead can always
move if the political climate becomes unsuitable. While a
seastead is likely to import many goods, being able to supply its
own basic necessities will also add greatly to its independence.
This is why seasteads are to some degree self-sufficient, and
either roving or at least movable if necessary. This approach to
nation founding reduces - but does not eliminate - the difficulty
in finding sovereignty by operating in international waters.
Further discussion of maritime law can be found in the Ocean Environment - Politics
section.
Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/why.html#Freedom_of_movement_and_selfsufficiency_are_both_i
Add a comment
Comments:
Add a comment:
We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional.
Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers.
Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This
will be improved later.
Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/why.html for this
day,
week,
month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package