Comments page
(You may have to reload this page to see new comments
or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source
section may have been edited since some of these comments were
made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 16:51:32 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 17:00:09 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:15:48 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:30:05 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:14 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:38 EST 2004
]
A solid, realistic plan can stand criticism and review. It is
the scams, the half-baked, the grandiose but insubstantial, which
must hide behind a facade of mystery. In our experience, the
less you see up front, the less there is behind. Sure, its
possible that behind the curtain lies a complex and
well-considered plan which is being hidden for some legitimate
reason, but the odds are heavily against it. If it looks like
the emperor has no clothes, he's probably got goosebumps.
Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/why.html#A_solid_realistic_plan_can_stand_criticism_and_rev
Add a comment
Comments:
[Sat Jun 4 09:04:50 PDT 2005-154] Scott Scheule (NOSPAMscottscheule@gmail.com.NOSPAM):
Patri, Patri, Patri.
If you want to be possessive, just use Eye Tee Ess
But if you want a contraction, use Eye Tee apostrophe Ess.
[Fri Dec 16 13:49:42 PST 2005-349] Eliot Grey:
So much for hoping to attract 'Higher Criticism'...
Add a comment:
We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional.
Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers.
Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This
will be improved later.
Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/why.html for this
day,
week,
month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package