Comments page
(You may have to reload this page to see new comments
or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source
section may have been edited since some of these comments were
made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Wed Aug 11 18:05:03 PDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 16:51:29 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 17:00:07 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:15:41 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:30:03 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:12 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:34 EST 2004
]
It was later determined that one of the three legs had broken
under the strain, rendering the tripod of support unstable. Its
important to note that Towers Two and Three survived this and
many other Atlantic storms over the next few years, although they
were evacuated a number of times to ensure that no repeat tragedy
ocurred. Eventually currents weakened the foundations and they
were decommissioned. (We'd like to note here that the TT's
weakness was their supporting legs, which our design avoids
entirely).
Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/ocean.html#_It_was_later_determined_that_one_of_the_three_leg
Add a comment
Comments:
[Wed Apr 5 13:52:03 PDT 2006-94] Eliot Grey:
Huh? Whether floating or bottom-sitting, an ocean structure is still supported by its supports, of whatever number, and whether they are called legs or " a spar " does not to this non-engineer seem to matter very much...
Add a comment:
We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional.
Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers.
Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This
will be improved later.
Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/ocean.html for this
day,
week,
month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package