Comments page
(You may have to reload this page to see new comments
or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source
section may have been edited since some of these comments were
made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Wed Aug 11 18:05:03 PDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 16:51:29 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 17:00:07 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Fri Oct 29 02:10:54 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Fri Oct 29 02:15:02 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:15:41 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:30:03 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:12 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:32 EST 2004
]
To design a safe and reasonably-priced seastead, we need to
know what wave heights to expect. Most important is the
worst-case height. Since this will depend on the exact region
and seasons, we'll just give a general overview, as well as
sources for additional information. Wave height is a function of
wind strength and the "fetch", which is the distance over which
the wave been building. Oceanographers use a statistic for wave
height called the "significant height", denoted Hs.
This is the average of the 1/3 highest waves (from crest to
trough) over a given time period (20 minutes for [NDBC] buoys). One wave in a thousand
is twice Hs, and about one wave in three-hundred
thousand is a so-called "rogue" whose height is two and
a half to three times Hs [Bascom1980]. However, this
distribution may reflect out-dated assumptions about rogue
rarity, and must be investigated further.
Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/ocean.html#To_design_a_safe_and_reasonablypriced_seastead_we_
Add a comment
Comments:
Add a comment:
We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional.
Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers.
Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This
will be improved later.
Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/ocean.html for this
day,
week,
month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package