Comments page
(You may have to reload this page to see new comments
or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source
section may have been edited since some of these comments were
made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 16:51:29 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 17:00:07 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:12 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:31 EST 2004
]
For example, the oil companies have not been able to break
ground on a new refinery in the US in decades { Source? - P}.
They might like to have a refinery that floats. That way they
can refine the crude closer to the source and just ship the
finished product around. We suspect that Union Carbide feels
similarly about manufacturing pesticides. Processes that do
not require large energy or freshwater inputs are ideal, and
for them, it may be cheaper to build a seastead than go through
the permitting process on land. Its also a lot faster. This
is true even for a clean, non-polluting plant.
Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/market.html#For_example_the_oil_companies_have_not_been_able_t
Add a comment
Comments:
Add a comment:
We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional.
Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers.
Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This
will be improved later.
Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/market.html for this
day,
week,
month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package