Comments page

(You may have to reload this page to see new comments or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source section may have been edited since some of these comments were made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Thu Dec 11 16:14:28 PST 2003 ]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 16:51:28 EDT 2004 ]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 17:00:06 EDT 2004 ]
[ Modified Fri Oct 29 02:10:48 EDT 2004 ]
[ Modified Fri Oct 29 02:15:01 EDT 2004 ]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:11 EST 2004 ]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:27 EST 2004 ]

We should comment that most of these self-sufficiency books start out with a preface that we will paraphrase as "humanity is running out of energy and resources; thus, we must change our evil high technology ways and go back to basic living off the land." These statements should not be taken at face value, because many of them are not supported by scientific evidence. For example, books written in the late seventies, during the energy crisis, predict that energy costs would only get worse - when in fact they got (and have remained) much better.

Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/infra.html#We_should_comment_that_most_of_these_selfsufficien

Add a comment

Comments:


Add a comment:

We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional. Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers. Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This will be improved later.
Name:
Email:

Comments:


Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/infra.html for this day, week, month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package d.org/comments/logs/week/paper/infra.html/">week, month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package ody> ody> ody>