Comments page
(You may have to reload this page to see new comments
or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source
section may have been edited since some of these comments were
made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 16:51:28 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 17:00:06 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Fri Oct 29 02:10:48 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Fri Oct 29 02:15:01 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:11 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:27 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Sat Nov 27 15:18:30 EST 2004
]
An interesting counter-argument is that while people on land
may have plenty of energy and resources, seasteads will not. The
doomsday-type analysis which assumes limited and expensive
resources is actually more applicable to our environment than the
one it was written for. (To be fair, it is also somewhat
applicable to remote pieces of land). So even those seasteaders
who agree with our skepticism about apocalyptic claims should not
dismiss such viewpoints completely, as they are relevant to this
new frontier.
Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/infra.html#An_interesting_counterargument_is_that_while_peopl
Add a comment
Comments:
[Tue Sep 21 23:15:58 EDT 2004-264] OCTAVIAN:
AS A SAILOR I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT WHEN "OUT THERE" ONE SHOULD BE 100%SELF SUFFICIENT IN TERMS OF POWER.THATS WHY MOST CRUSING BOATS CARRY LARGE BANKS OF BATTERIES,SOLAR PANELS,WIND GENERATORS AND DIESEL GENERATORS.A SEASTEAD SHOULD BE NO EXEMPTION.OCTAVIAN
Add a comment:
We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional.
Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers.
Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This
will be improved later.
Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/infra.html for this
day,
week,
month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package