Comments page
(You may have to reload this page to see new comments
or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source
section may have been edited since some of these comments were
made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Wed Aug 11 17:05:02 PDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 16:51:23 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Sep 20 17:00:03 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Sep 23 22:45:01 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Fri Oct 29 02:10:24 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Fri Oct 29 02:15:01 EDT 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:14:19 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:15:08 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:07 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:20 EST 2004
]
The most important design criterion is that the seastead be
safe in the harsh ocean environment, with its wind, waves, and currents. Thus all of these
designs will need to use some of our wave avoidance techniques.
Besides safety, the structure must be reasonably cost-effective,
or it will never be built. Cost may well be the main barrier
which has prevented people from becoming seasteaders. Its also
important that the design scale well to different sizes, so that
we can apply our incremental
approach. Dynamic Geography
tells us that physical modularity is also very desirable.
Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/designs.html#The_most_important_design_criterion_is_that_the_se
Add a comment
Comments:
Add a comment:
We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional.
Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers.
Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This
will be improved later.
Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/designs.html for this
day,
week,
month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package