Comments page
(You may have to reload this page to see new comments
or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source
section may have been edited since some of these comments were
made.)
Original Paragraph:
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:14:20 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Thu Nov 11 21:15:09 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 14:48:10 EST 2004
]
[ Modified Mon Nov 15 15:00:22 EST 2004
]
The interconnections must be somewhat flexible because of the
dynamic forces operating on the seasteads. For example, as waves
pass through, there will be continuous small fluctuations in the
relative buoyancy of platforms. On a longer time scale,
differences in weight onboard may cause platforms to want to rise
or fall relative to each other. Good buoyancy control is very
important because these differences will put great stress on the
joints. A particularly tricky problem is mooring interconnected
platforms, especially in areas with changing tidal currents.
Source: http://seastead.org/commented/paper/designs.html#The_interconnections_must_be_somewhat_flexible_bec
Add a comment
Comments:
[Tue Mar 1 20:51:11 EST 2005-59] Peter McCluskey (NOSPAMpcm@rahul.net.NOSPAM):
Are you planning to make the interconnections strong enough to guarantee
that two platforms will never collide? Or do you plan to make the
platforms strong enough to withstand a collision at whatever speeds
differences in current or wind can push two platforms together?
Add a comment:
We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional.
Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers.
Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
NEW: If you post a comment, you are giving permission to the author
to publish the comment (credited to whatever name you leave), if they desire.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This
will be improved later.
Back to original paragraph
View all comments on paper/designs.html for this
day,
week,
month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package