| Prev | Table of Contents | Next |
| Additional Infrastructure | Recent comments: day, week, month (about commenting) | Making It Happen |
"If this country is worth saving, it's worth saving at a profit"
-- H.L. Hunt
Many projects dream of some extremely rich person coming
along, seeing their proposal, and saying "Neat - to whom do I
write the check?" In reality, seasteads are much more likely to
happen if somebody can figure out how to make a buck with them.
If floating cities are worth building, they're worth building at
a profit. And if they can't be built profitably, it is far from
clear that they are worth building.This section outlines some
business and customer possibilities for seasteads.
It's very important to be honest about the advantages and
limitations of doing business on board a floting platform. We've
seen numerous proposals for ideas to make money on floating
cities that are obviously not going to work, because they don't
leverage any of the comparative advantages. There are lots of
people out there who want to make money, and there is no easy way
or magic recipe to do so. By moving a business to the ocean, you
are cutting it off from resources and customers, making
everything more expensive and more difficult. To be able to
compete with the possibiltiy of doing the same thing on land,
there has to be a damn good reason why the ocean is a better
place.
After a fair bit of thought, we've only come up with two
unique features of seasteading which provide its competitive
edge. The first is the freedom offered by sovereignty and the
second is the unique ability of seasteads to provide some of the
comfort and stability of land in remote marine locations. Hence
any business must center around one of these features.
The fundamental seastead business is that of manufacturing,
and perhaps operating, the seasteads. We think the best way to
characterize this industry is as real estate development. The
main differences from conventional development are that the land
must be built instead of made, and the developer must provide all
utilities rather than just paying for a connection to the grid.
An example of a similar business is a company called
International Marine Flotation System Inc. They design and build
floating homes, marinas, restaraunts, docks, and roads based on
concrete floats. They've even built entire floating home
developments. A seastead manufacturer would be in a similar
business, but geared towards constructing more isolated and
self-sufficient real estate [FloatingHomes].
One nice thing about this version of the real estate business
is that its in some ways less speculative than on land. A land
developer must often risk a large chunk of money on a piece of
land or a building. Because seasteads are modular and
expandable, the developer can start small - like building a
skyscraper a few floors at a time. If successful, profits can be
rolled into further expansion. Since there is plenty of room on
the ocean, this means no ceiling to the potential profits from
the initial stake. This goes a long way to making up for the
uncertainty due to the novelty of the seastead business [Hunting2001].
While we're going to present a number of business ideas to
demonstrate why this real estate is potentially valuable, the
seastead developer should not be specifying its exact set of
tenants in advance. Just like the builder of a skyscraper, its
important to know something about potential customers (that they
exist, their utilities needs), but there's no need to
micro-manage. The seastead builder should be in the real estate
business, not the fishing, banking, or medical research business.
As Eric Hunting says: "The business plan is straightforward
because everything revolves around creating habitable space, the
revenue it produces in rent, lease, or sale, and the costs
accrued in maintaining it, making it useful, and making it
attractive. ".
{ There are enough of these that its probably worth grouping them into sections }
With this business model, we hypothesise that there are
enough groups of people that want a seastead, for whatever
reason, that it makes sense to form a corporation that
specializes in building seasteads to order. The corporation
would not worry about the day-to-day operation of the seasteads
it produced. These groups may be interested in residential
seasteads for political freedom, or they may be developing one
of the many business ideas we propose.
The residential groups can be roughly partitioned into
political groups (e.g. libertarians [Atlantis1994], socialists,
communists, etc.), religious groups (e.g. fundamentalist
Christians, Muslims, etc.) , and single issue groups
(e.g. drugs [Island], nudists,
gun enthusiasts [FrontSight], environmentalists [Celestopia], etc.) While
sometimes these groups can legally form their own land based
communities, they may prefer to do so in a more isolated
environment like a seastead to avoid hassles with local
authorities. Some of these groups will have no legal land based
option available to them, so something like a seastead will be
their only option. Essentially seasteads would function as
intentional communities, with far greater independence and
autonomy.
{Restructure this as Resort w/ subsections, cruise ships,
timeshare, drugs, etc.}
The luxury resort business is thriving [stick a few refs
here, maybe a pretty graph]. While many resorts try to leverage
some local community or artifact, there are others that merely
exist to provide a complete experience unto themselves. For
example, many people go to Club Med® and cruise
ships with no real intention of ever leaving the facilities. A
luxury seastead resort could be tailored to meet the needs of
these people. Note that a luxury resort seastead would have to
compete with the existing luxury resorts. Thus, issues of how
to get to and from the seastead, providing amenities, etc., all
have to be worked through. A seastead can offer some
experiences that may not be possible at other Luxury Resorts,
and these may be the key to its success.
An example of a resort tailored to a specific,
freedom-oriented issue is the Front Sight Firearms Training
Institute in Nevada. Besides offering training in the use of
firearms, as well as similar topics (chemical agents, climbing
and rappelling, and soon executive protection), Front Sight's
plan is to become a luxury resort for gun lovers. Around a
third of the 170 1-acre home sites have already been sold as
part of a package which includes a lifetime membership in the
training facility. Condominiums and a hotel are planned as
well. Front Sight is expanding rapidly with the income stream
from its members, and seems to have found/created a succesful
(and previously untapped) niche market.
The United Arab Emirates are pursuing an extremely large,
ambitious, expensive project to build an ultra-luxury resort
called The Palms. What is interesting about this particular
project is that it is being built entirely on the world largest
man-made islands. In fact, the islands will be visible from
the moon with the naked eye, and will create 120 km of
shoreline. Construction began in 2001 and is expected to end
in 2007. { I've been to their webpage but I couldn't find it,
need a reference and info on cost - P }
Can a floating luxury resort be profitable? The answer has
been yes for decades, as we can see by looking at the cruise
ship industry. This ships produce nothing, import all their
food, water, and fuel, and still turn a profit. About 10
million people a year take a cruise, providing about $17B in
revenue. Clearly a floating resort can be a profitable
business model. This is not to say that it will be easy -
cruise ships actually take people places, which is an
advantage. But seasteads can provide some other things to
offset that.
Sin IndustriesA seastead is the ideal setting for the
so-called sin industries like drugs, prostitution, and
gambling. Drugs are low-capital and high-profit, but also
carry a great political risks. Still, European countries are
relatively tolerant, and as long as drugs are only used
locally, the idea may fly. [insert drug stuff from
elsewhere].
Prostitution, as long as it does not involve children, is
widely accepted. It is at least claimed that some tourism to
Thailand and Costa Rica is motivated by cheap prostitutes.
Gambling is also widely accepted. While gambling is common
enough that it is unlikely to motivate visitors, having it adds
substantially to a resort's bottom line.
Timeshares are in between an intentional community and
a hotel resort. The residents are owners, but they do not stay
there all year. We believe this has some major advantages in
terms of financing and market appeal. With financing, time
share residents pay up front. Thus you don't have to get a loan
with the hope of having enough business to pay it back. You let
people buy shares, and when you've sold enough, you start
construction.
In terms of the market, we believe that the number of people
willing to spend a few weeks each year on a seastead
is far greater than the number willing to drop
everything and devote their lives to it. This is even more
dramatically true when you consider financial resources along
with desire. In our many conversations about seasteading, we
almost never encounter people who are seriously interested in
living on a stead full time and have the money to buy a full
share upfront. Yet we constantly meet people who find the
concept intriguing and would love to try it part-time.
Earning money becomes less of a problem for the residents,
because they can work normal jobs the rest of the year. Much
less self-sufficiency is needed because resources flow in from
the outside. As time goes on, seasteads become sea-cities, the
internal economy grows, people find profitable seastead-based
businesses, and more and more people can choose to live there
full-time. This exemplifies our incremental approach.
While being completely underwater makes the engineering
quite difficult, having some habitable underwater area has much
to be said for it. It has an undeniable romantic appeal
(underwater weddings? Parties? Honeymoon suites?). Jules'
Undersea Lodge in Key Largo, Florida, charges $300-$600 per
night [Jules]. It has received a
lot of media attention, for example it was featured on
"Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous". Hydropolis, the worlds
first luxury underwater hotel, is to be built in Dubai (close
to The Palms) and completed
in late 2006 [ReutersDubai]. The project
is funded to the tune of five hundred million dollars.
Poseiden Resorts is another planned project [Poseidon]. The Global Coral Reef
Alliance [GCRA] has demonstrated
that electro-accretion can be used to build and sustain
artificial coral reefs for diving.
Even from an above-water seasted, underwater tourism and
exploration can be done via submersibles. There are some
interesting personal subs on the market [Hawkes], [USSubs, as well as
semi-submersibles [SubSeaSystems] suited for
tourism. Remotely-operated vehicles could be used initially,
as that is a lot easier than carrying around actual
passengers.
The Aquatic Pod Suite from the Hammacher Schlemmer
catalog is described as:
The world's only aquatic pod suite that offers panoramic views simultaneously above and below the surface of the water. Circular, with a 'flying saucer' aspect, the suite rests directly on the water, the lower portion submerged approximately five feet. Perfect as a getaway at a favorite lagoon, beach, lake or river, the suite offers spectacular 300° views of the environment. Beam lights illuminate the depths for viewing the aquatic surroundings after dark. With a 150 square-foot interior, the self-contained, circular suite has all the furnishings for two people to enjoy on-the-water living. The interior has a central air conditioning system, desalination unit, mini-bar, audio-video system with Bose stereo, king-size bed, toilet and shower. Outside, a floating terrace circumscribes the unit, providing a 6.6-foot-wide surface for sun bathing or enjoying breezes off the water. The inflatable terrace also lends stability and extra buoyancy to the suite, and protects it from scratches and bumps when visiting boats or windsurfers dock alongside. The above-water entrance is a watertight aviation design that prevents stray moisture and splashes from dampening the interior. Unlike houseboats, this unit remains permanently anchored at a specific location by an environmentally-friendly anchor that attaches with a durable, corrosion-resistant chain. It can also be towed by a boat. A 2.5kva diesel generator with exhaust silencer produces 220-volt power to supply all necessary electricity.
[HammacherSchlemmer]
The listed price is $91,100. While we don't know how well
the product has sold, at least this provides some evidence of a
market for floating platforms.
A November 2004 article in the Journal of the American
Geriatric Society suggested that living on a cruise ship might be
an alternative to assisted living facilities. The abstract
reads:
Options for elderly patients who can no longer remain independent are limited. Most choices involve assisted living facilities, 24-hour caregivers, or nursing homes. State and federal assistance for payment for individual care is limited, and seniors usually pay for most costs out of pocket. For those patients who have the means to afford assisted living centers or nursing homes, "cruise ship care" is proposed. Traveling alongside traditional tourists, groups of seniors would live on cruise ships for extended periods of time. Cruise ships are similar to assisted living centers in the amenities provided, costs per month, and many other areas.
This article begins with an examination of the needs of seniors in assisted living facilities and then explores the feasibility of cruise ship care in answering those needs. Similarities between cruise ship travel and assisted living care, as well as the monetary costs of both options, are defined. A decision tree with selections for nonindependent care for seniors was created including cruise ship care as an alternative. Using a Markov model over 20 years, a representative cost-effectiveness analysis was performed that showed that cruises were priced similarly to assisted living centers and were more efficacious. Proposed ways that cruise ship companies could further accommodate the needs of seniors interested in this option are also suggested. Implementation for cruise ship care on the individual basis is also presented. Ultimately, it is wished to introduce a feasible and possibly more desirable option to seniors who can no longer remain independent.
[JAGS_10_2004]
Seasteads have some potential advantages for a retirement
home. They are affected less by the waves, which should be
more comfortable, and they have more space for permanent
residents. A disadvantage is that they don't go to as many
exotic locations. { Other Thoughts? }
There are some manufacturing processes that are
sufficiently dangerous that they need fair amounts of area
around them. The land acquisition costs and corresponding
regulatory hoops required may be quite substantial and
expensive. Its also hard to acquire a large enough buffer zone
around your plant to convince people that its safe.
For example, the oil companies have not been able to break
ground on a new refinery in the US in decades { Source? - P}.
They might like to have a refinery that floats. That way they
can refine the crude closer to the source and just ship the
finished product around. We suspect that Union Carbide feels
similarly about manufacturing pesticides. Processes that do
not require large energy or freshwater inputs are ideal, and
for them, it may be cheaper to build a seastead than go through
the permitting process on land. Its also a lot faster. This
is true even for a clean, non-polluting plant.
What is nice about this example is that it provides a truly
gargantuan market, worth literally billions of dollars, if
seasteads provide a useful solution. Investors like to see a
large potential upside. It may be possible to get some capital
from relevant industries, as the cost of seasteading research
is small compared to how much it might save them.
One interesting twist is an industry which requires little in the way of physical raw materials: outsourced coding. A business trying to do this was founded in 2004:
Take a used cruise ship, plant it in international waters three miles off the coast of El Segundo, near Los Angeles, people it with 600 of the brightest software engineers they can find around the world (both men and women), and run a 24-hour-a-day programming shop, thereby avoiding H-1B visa hassles while still exploiting offshore labor cost arbitrage and completing development projects in half the time they'd take onshore or offshore...
The scheme first came to Mr. Cook one day while he was cutting his grass in San Diego. With his unusual background as a super-tanker captain and an IT professional, the idea made a lot of sense to him. He took it to Mr. Green, with whom he'd worked before and who has served as both a buyer and provider of outsourcing services, and they saw the possibility of creating a new form of IT sourcing.
A year ago, they formed SeaCode, Inc. with Mr. Cook serving as CEO and Mr. Green as COO. They've signed on a marketing director and CTO and, even more importantly, found an investor. Start-up costs won't be cheap. A broker right now is searching for just the right ship to buy -- somewhere in the neighborhood of $10 million.
[SourcingMag2005]
In order to study the ocean, ocean scientists normally
need to get on a boat and go out to sea. It would be useful to
have a platform that stays on station from which they could do
their research. Under this scenario, the seastead would be
towed to an interesting location and the research would take
place as a dedicated community. The benefit of having the
scientists always on station may outweigh the additional costs
of operating a seastead. An example of such a platform is the
Scripps Institution of Oceonagraphy's Flip, or Floating Instrument
Platform, which can float horizontally or vertically.
The kinds of seasteads described in this paper will be
quite self-sufficient once they are built. As such they will
appeal to members of the environmental movement as an example
of how to build communities that live within their
environmental means as opposed to the resource wasteful
communities of today. In addition, the environmentalists have
successfully managed to raise large amounts of money to support
their cause. Perhaps several of these organizations could get
together to fund an environmental demonstrator
seastead.
Most of the countries in the world have signed onto the
Berne Copyright Convention. A seastead in the middle of the
ocean is not bound by any copyright laws. Thus, it would be
legal to obtain and digitize a vast library of material that
national and university libraries can not amass simply because
of copyright restrictions. While it would not be possible to
export this material back out to the Internet, one could
imagine researchers choosing to come to the world library
seastead simply because they could do their research in a
fraction of the time required to do it using conventional
libraries.
Patent laws vary from country to country. There is a
push to unify these various patent laws across all of the
industrialized nations. A seastead in the middle of the ocean
would be exempt from all patents. Thus, to save money, somebody
could choose to implement some portion of a patented process on
a seastead. While nations could choose to impose tariff on
products imported from a seastead, not all countries would do
so.
A risk with such a venture is that a corporation who is being
infringed upon might encourage their friendly national navy to board
the seastead and shut it down. As will frequently be the case, the
seastead must balance the profit and attractiveness of unique
approaches with the potential problems.
Marinas offer services such as shelter, water, food,
electricity, and medical facilities to the boating population.
While seasteads may not be able to supply the same level or
price as land-based facilities, they can service remote areas
where other options are not available, as well as offering some
unique attractions. The seastead can be moved whenever the
current crop of boaters in a given area grow bored, thereby
picking up another crop.
A seastead could serve as the base for touring some
unique and remote area. It would offer more roomy and luxurious
accomodations than a boat, and provide a runway, allowing for
access by air instead of sea. The tour destination could be an
island or archipelago, something underwater (reefs, sunken
ships), glaciers, or anything else remote and interesting. If
the seastead is mobile, it may periodically move so that it can
offer an endless variety of tour destinations.
A seastead could serve as a supply cache, storage
facility, and processing facility for commerical fishing,
allowing fleets to go farther and stay longer.
There are a number of products which seasteads could
manufacture and sell to the rest of the world. In The Millenial
Project, Marshall Savage discusses several options, including
protein powder from spirullina algae,
pearls, seaweed, fish, and shellfish [Savage1992 pp. 44-57]. Seaweed can be made into paper and
textiles.
Seasteads may have a major advantage
for mariculture. One reason why the sea is a much harsher
environment for life than land is that when things die on land,
their remains are readily available for scavenging. When
things die in the ocean, they sink to the ocean floor, removing
useful resources from the food chain. Natural upwelling zones,
which constitute only about 1% of the oceans surface, produce
approximately half of the worlds fish. Once OTEC is a viable
energy source, or perhaps earlier if wave-powered pumps such as
the Isaac's Pump are used, seasteads will be bringing
nutrient-dense water to the surface as a side effect of
generating power. This can be used as the base for a food
chain of aquatic life. { expand this discussion? Need references }
Government bureaucracy is a major barrier to medical and
biotechnological advancement. The FDA has historically been slow to
approve new medical treatments, and promising areas such as stem
cell research have been curtailed by governments. Seasteads would
be an excellent place for cutting-edge medical research and
treatment.
Ships far from land generally communicate via satellites,
which are very expensive and have a high lag time. Seasteads could
extend this range, providing phone/internet service. The platform
would be connected either to an undersea cable, or by bouncing
through some relaying platforms. The seastead design's height and
stability make it well-suited to being a communication
tower.
This category includes banking and financial services,
corporation registration, and internet hosting. Some readers
may be surprised to see this category listed so far down, as
these have been often proposed as natural businesses for a new
nation. Unfortunately, we seen them as problematic. While
there is a large market for virtual services, there is also a
lot of competition. Any country with a fiber optic connection
can enter these industries, and many have. The simplest way to
look at it is that the required infrastructure (communications
bandwidth) is much, much cheaper on land than at sea. Thus it
is unlikely to be a comparative advantage for a floating city.
For example, we believe that one of the reasons HavenCo had
difficulty finding customers was that they had to compete with
the Bahamas, Panama, Costa Rica, etc., with little extra to
offer. Their regulatory advantages were offset by bandwidth
and cost disadvantages. Virtual businesses can always switch
jurisdictions if there is a crackdown, or locate redundantly in
multiple countries. There are better ways (like cryptography)
to achieve the desired goals of a data haven than putting it in
a remote location.
Financial service industries are quite conservative, and it
will be a long time before seasteads are seen as stable enough.
Additionally, since these services can be located anywhere,
seasteads must compete against the top jurisdictions in the
world. And that is a difficult task.
This business model is not exactly far-fetched, given
that its what the vast majority of fixed ocean structures have
been built for. Besides oil, there is methane hydrate, as well
as a wealth of renewable power from the sun, wind, and waves.
While such sources are currently not competitive, it is
certainly possible they will be in the future. The ocean is a
great place to get wind energy, since speed is higher, and
energy goes up with the cube of speed. With a large enough
budget, OTEC may be feasible. With the right system, wave
power could be economical. Nuclear power could be kept
offshore to reduce the negative effects of a meltdown (although
such problems are very unlikely nowadays). Any of these
sources could be used to make hydrogen, which would be shipped
away.
As with any seastead business, there will have to be good
economic reasons to generate energy on the ocean, since
maintenance is more expensive. Since there are substantial
transmission losses, it's best to generate electricity close to
where it is used. However, as we can see from oil platforms,
OTEC, etc., some aspects of this industry actually are suited
to being done at sea.
There are a number of advantages to launching from the
ocean. Rockets are dangerous, and its good to have not only a
clear area to launch from, but to be over uninhabited areas
while going up. Launch vendors have to warn people about
potential falling booster stages, and there are a lot less
people to worry about on the ocean. Additionally, it makes
recovery of booster stages easier, since the ocean is softer
than land, and its easier to get anywhere on it, and transport
something heavy back.
Also, the earth's equator is the best place to launch from,
because you get maximum energy from the Earth's rotation.
Heavy regulation in countries like the US slows innovation in
the space industry, partly because of these safety risks, and
the ocean would be a lower regulation environment. In general,
a floating platform is a pretty good place to launch and
recover boosters from.
Many people know about the incredible wealth of Hong
Kong, an area with few natural resources. Some of them know
about the free market policies which helped lead to the wealth.
But Hong Kong's placement is also crucial - it is in a
convenient location to act as the cargo gateway from Asia to
the world.
There are some locations that are naturally suited to
transshipment, ie moving cargo between ships. Since a seastead
can go anywhere, we can just look at the entire ocean, find the
point in the water that would be a bustling port if only there
were an island there, and build one.
If you're not familiar with the term, aquaculture means
raising sea creatures like finfish and shellfish. The parallel
goes something like:
| Hunting | Ranching |
| Gathering | Farming |
| Fishing | Aquaculture |
| Agricultural Revolution | ? Aquaculture Revolution ? |
If you look at the transition from hunter/gatherer to modern
agriculture, you see a huge gain in efficiency which allowed
human population to skyrocket. Current ocean fishing
techniques are much like hunting. There is a classic tragedy
of the commons problem. Each individual gains from depleting
the oceans, and no one replenishes them because others would
get most of the benefit. Since no one owns them,
technology goes into better harvesting and processing, not
better production.
The standard way to solve such a problem is to privatize the
commons. While some novel schemes for creating property rights
in fish have been used in coast areas, it's much harder with
migratory ocean fish. But aquaculture solves tis problem,
since it generally involves raising fish in huge nets. It
seems likely that this will produce a drastically higher output
per unit effort, just as happened with food production on land
millenia ago.
Not only can we get a cheaper supply of marine products, but
there is a huge demand for aquaculture. Not only is the
world's population increasing, but people are eating more fish
as the health benefits become more widely recognized. There is
no other way to meet this demand, besides offshore aquaculture.
Production by fishing is expected to remain flat at best, due
to the overfishing problems mentioned. Freshwater aquaculture
has to compete with all the other demands for freshwater by our
growing population. Most seawater aquaculture occurs in
coastal regions, which are also in high demand. So offshore is
the only way to go, and thus this is a very promising business
opportunity for seasteads.
As you can see, there are quite a variety of business
possibilities for a seastead. We believe there are many
potential customers as well.
{Wayne - There is a market. Residensea, Club Med, general interest}
{ Not clear that this should be a separate section. ie Market depends on Business Model. Should merge. }
Historically, many new-country projects have been
envisioned by freedom-oriented individuals ([Atlantis1994], [Freedonia], [FreedomShip]). Such
individuals have contributed time and money to projects much
less realistic than seasteading. Thus we think it is
reasonable to expect a great deal of interest in our project
from the libertarian community once it is clear that our plan
is actually feasible. While US National Libertarian Party
membership has been steadily declining, we believe that this is
a result of libertarians becoming weary of the lack of results,
not a philosophical change in the population. The so-called
"War On Terror" is currently adding more bite to the Libs
perennial dissatisfaction.
The past few decades have seen a huge trend towards
increased environmental awareness. The Sierra Club had over
600,000 members in 1996 [Sierra1997]. The Nature
Conservancy is the nations tenth largest nonprofit, with assets
in 2001 of almost three billion dollars, and annual
contributions of over five hundred million [NatureCon2001]. Contrast this
with 28,000 members of the US National Libertarian Party (as of
11/2001), and you see that environmentalists may be the largest
market. Self-sufficient seasteads with their low environmental
footprint will have tremendous appeal to these
individuals.
Recreational drugs are illegal almost everywhere in the
world. While they are still widely available, prices are high,
quality is erratic, selection is poor, and users risk
imprisonment and the confiscation of their possessions. The
fact that such a market exists despite these factors is
indication of the vast demand for these products. We believe
that there is a substantial market for a facility which offers
a wide variety of high-quality drugs in a legal setting with
available medical care in case of emergency. Even after the
extra costs for "doing things right", such as medical
facilities and rigorous purity testing, the profit margin for
recreational drugs is immense.
One particularly interesting part of this market is for
those individuals interested in receiving psychological therapy
which uses psychedelic drugs as part of the counseling. For
example, MDMA (ecstasy) was widely used for this purpose while
it was legal. The Multidisciplinary Association for
Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) has received FDA approval for a $5M,
5-year clinical study to evaluate MDMA for the treatment of
post-traumatic stress disorder [Doblin2002]. Anecdotal reports
of the success of MDMA-based psychotherapy for individuals
unable to progress through conventional methods are extremely
positive [Shulgin1991
pp. 69-75, Shulgin1997, Stafford1992 pp 78-80].
Several other psychedelic drugs have shown great promise in
studies as well, such as LSD [Stafford1992, pp. 78-82].
One positive aspect of this kind of drug use is the
resulting publicity. While using drugs recreationally has a
negative association, medical use is seen in a positive light.
Medical marijuana treatment is a good example, and as some
conditions require chronic use, it is more likely that
sufferers will find it worthwhile to move because of their
condition. At least two individuals (Steve Kubby and Renee
Boje) have sought political refuge in Canada because the US
would not allow them access to medical marijuana.
Note that the extreme paranoia of the US about drugs may
restrict the possible locations for seasteads catering to this
market. For example, the Caribbean might be close enough to
make Uncle Sam uncomfortable.
These people are just as fanatic about their hobby as
anybody. They will spend serious amounts of money to bag a
tuna or the like. They might like the option of being able to
camp out on a seastead at night rather than always having to
return to shore or camp out in the crowded ship. This requires
that the seastead be parked where deep sea fishing
occurs.
Scuba divers are another hobbyist group that
loves to spend money. If the seastead is parked near some
interesting reefs, it becomes a reasonable place for them
to visit.
People who own and operate boats (sail or motor-powered)
often have extra money on their hands. They might like the
challenge of locating and visiting a seastead. If there are
interesting facilities on board, so much the better.
People with personal helicopters and STOL aircraft
might like the challenge of landing at a seastead.
Seasteads could provide supplies, storage, and general
support for commercial fishing, as well as emergency medical
facilities.
Some combination of these approaches will likely be used. For
example, a residential seastead (condo, time-share, or hotel)
might devote part of its area to research experiments. Since it
would have a dock and infrastructure, it might as well sell its
amenities to boaters. Residents would have access to a digital
library, as well as deep-sea fishing and scuba diving equipment.
Fishing, diving, and interesting tours would help fill hotel
rooms. As time goes on, the market will determine which seastead
services have the greatest demand.
One may well ask how a seastead can compete against a world
full of other recreation options. There are many resorts, each
competing to lure travelers - isn't the competition tough? Won't
the primitive amenities be a major downside? It is clear,
however, that there is a demand for resorts with primitive
amenities, since many exist. We can't initially offer tennis
courts and the comforts of home, but even if that rules out 99%
of vacationers, that's OK. All we need to do is appeal
sufficiently to a minority that they prefer us over other
options. We think that the novelty of a seastead as a work of
engineering, an environmentally sustainable community, and an
experiment in self-governance will get us that minority.
| Prev | Table of Contents | Next |
| Additional Infrastructure | Making It Happen |